In your hands ...   Stand up for Life

From fertilization to natural death,
life is precious!

 

 

Take a stand for life.  Click Here!

 

Father Pat: a Respect Life Homily

 

Click here for the newest Vatican Statement
on Embryonic Human Cloning, 09/24/02


 Click here for the 2002 Vatican Statement on Cloning


Click Here for the 2001 Vatican Statement on Embryonic Human Cloning

 

Click here for photos of Life Chain in La Crosse, Wisconsin

 

Priests for Life.
Father Pat is a member. Why not join?

 

Take a stand against human cloning.  Click here!

 

Project Rachel
post-abortion help
Pro-Life Wisconsin
an awesome site!
abortionfacts.com
pro-choice?
this page will change your mind!
Our Lady of Guadalupe
Patroness of the Americas

and the Unborn

A Pro-Life Reflection
on the life of Saint Patrick
The Arm Chair Lobbyist
To inform, educate and involve us

Natural Family Planning

Our Infertility Page
Marriage Help Page The Ultimate Pro-Life Resource List!
Catholic Health Care Association of Wisconsin

Includes Living Will and Ethics Information

Evangelium Vitae, 1995
"On the value and inviolability of human life."

 Bishop Paul's Pastoral Letter on HIV/AIDS 

Rock for Life

Holy See urges comprehensive ban on
human embryonic cloning

 

VATICAN CITY, SEP 24, 2002 (VIS) - Archbishop Renato Martino, permanent observer to the United Nations, spoke yesterday in New York before the Ad Hoc Committee On An International Convention Against The Reproductive Cloning of Human Beings. He reiterated the Holy See's "well known" position on this question, saying it "supports and urges a world-wide comprehensive ban on human embryonic cloning for both reproductive and scientific purposes."

 

"Based on the biological and anthropological status of the human embryo and on the fundamental moral and civil rule," he affirmed, "it is illicit to kill an innocent even to bring about a good for society."

 

The apostolic nuncio noted that "the Holy See looks upon the distinction between 'reproductive' and so-called 'therapeutic' (or 'experimental') cloning to be unacceptable. This distinction masks the reality of the creation of a human being for the purpose of destroying him or her to produce embryonic stem cell lines or to conduct other experimentation."

 

On the other hand, he asserted, "the Holy See supports research on stem cells of post-natal origin since this approach ... is a sound, promising and ethical way to achieve tissue transplantation and cell therapy that could benefit humanity."

 

"Attempts at human cloning with a view to obtaining organs for transplants, ... insofar as they involve the manipulation and destruction of human embryos, are not morally acceptable." He underscored that the prospect of "cloning a human embryo, while intentionally planning its demise ... is repugnant to most people, including those who properly advocate for advancement in science and medicine."

 

Archbishop Martino pointed out that with some modern techniques "there is a risk of a new form of racism, for the development of these techniques could lead to the creation of a 'sub-category of human beings', destined basically for the convenience of certain others." Furthermore, if certain characteristics are selected and propagated through cloning, "this would be akin to the practice of eugenics leading to the institution of a 'super race'."

 

He concluding by noting that "the Universal Declaration of Human Rights reiterates the sanctity of all human life" and that "international law guarantees the right to life to all, not just some, human beings."


DELSS/CLONING/UN:MARTINO VIS 020924 (370)


Life!

   What a beautiful choice!


 

Vatican Statement on Human Cloning
(27 November 2001)

 

VATICAN CITY, NOV 27, 2001 (VIS) - Following is the communique released yesterday afternoon by the Holy See Press Office regarding the announcement on Sunday in the United States of the successful cloning of a human embryo:

 

   "The original article in the magazine 'The Journal of Regenerative Medicine', that the researchers of Advanced Cell Technologies published with the date of November 26, 2001, shows in all its dramatic nature the gravity of the event that has been realized: the in vitro production of a human embryo, as a matter of fact, several embryos, that have been developed, respectively, to the stage of two, four and six cells. This event was documented with clear color images from a scansion microscope, that point out the first phases of development of these human lives, which began not through the insemination of an egg with a sperm, but by activating eggs with nuclei of somatic cells.

 

   "The authors repeated that their intention is not to give rise to a human person. But what is it that they, as scientists, call in their article 'early embryo', an embryo in its initial stages? Here we have the bioethical question of 'when does human life begin' returning once again as a topical matter, though in all truth, this is a question that has never abated. Beyond the scientific event, in fact, this remains as the object of contention, being beyond doubt - as indicated by the researchers themselves  -  that here we find ourselves facing human embryos and not cells, as some would have us believe.

 

   "The event therefore, powerfully, brings us to repeat with force that the beginning of human life cannot be fixed by convention at a certain stage of development of an embryo; it exists, in reality, at the very first instant of existence of the embryo itself. This is understood more easily in the 'human' method of insemination between egg and sperm, but we must learn to recognize it also in the face of an 'inhuman' method, such as that of the reprogramming of a somatic nucleus in an egg cell; even with this method a new life can be created  -  as shown unfortunately in the experiment that was announced - a life that preserves, in any case, its dignity just as that of every human life brought into existence.

 

   "Therefore, notwithstanding the declared 'humanistic' intentions of those who announce amazing cures through this method, that will go via the cloning industry, a calm but firm evaluation is necessary that will show the moral gravity of this project and motivate its unequivocal condemnation. The principle that de facto has been introduced, in the name of health and well-being, sanctions, in fact, a true and proper discrimination among human beings based on the measure of time of their development (thus an embryo is worth less than a fetus, and a fetus less than a child, a child less than an adult), overturning the moral imperative that imposes, instead, the greatest care and maximum respect precisely of those who are not in a condition to defend themselves and to show their intrinsic dignity.

 

   "On the other hand, stem cell research shows that other paths are available, morally licit and valid from a scientific point of view, such as the utilization of stem cells that have been taken, for example, from an adult individual (there are many in each one of us), from maternal blood or from fetuses that were aborted spontaneously. This is the path that every honest scientist must follow to the end of reserving maximum respect for man, that is, for himself."

 

.../HUMAN EMBRYO CLONING/...    VIS 20011127 (610)

 

"When God gives life, He gives it forever."  Pope John Paul II

 


Part of Father Pat's Place  ©1999-2005 Father Pat Umberger 
You are visitor  since 01 October 1999

Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam.